Search this blog for Before The Moon Existed for previous articles.
(Source: Who Parked Our Moon?) In this next article, some of the points covered previously are skimmed over. The Moon is older than the Earth, heavier rocks are found on the surface, etc.
There is a mention that no water molecules have been found anywhere on the Moon, but interestingly enough, astronauts from Apollo 16 found some rocks that contained bits of rusted iron. Here comes that narrow-minded, isolationist point of view again: There must be natural water on the Moon, because that’s the only way the iron bits could have rusted! This is the great limitation of humanity, in my opinion, and it all goes back to Rome and the inception of the Catholic Church. This is why the Roman Christians burned down the library of Alexandria and murdered librarians like Hypatia, why the Dark Ages were so dark, why free thinkers were often chastised and at times murdered by the Holy Church Of God, and its effects are still seen today in the simple minds of the Sheeple.
The common sense answer is that maybe, just possibly, those rusty bits could have come from somewhere other than the waterless Moon, but no, these idiots in modern academia are bending over backwards every which way to propagate the narrow-mindedness and keep people stupid as to the history of their own planet and solar system. Darwin’s dogma and science are just as incapable of explaining the ins and outs of the universe as the Bible and Creationism are, and that’s all there is to it. Let’s move on, before I really go on a rant here…
On March of 1971, instruments left by astronauts reported a ‘wind of water.’ What the fuck is a wind of water? Seriously, they couldn’t say mist or vapor, or maybe even steam? Any sort of water at all is supposed to vaporize in the airless atmosphere on Earth, or so they say. That means water can’t exist on the Moon. But doesn’t this contradict the earlier statement that there must be water on the Moon to cause rust in iron bits? I’m assuming the iron bits were on or close to the surface here, so how in the hell would they have gotten wet in the first place, if the water vaporizes right away?
These ‘eruptions’ of water vapor were said to last 14 hours and covered an area of some 100 miles. The NAS-holes had to cover their butts, right, so they claimed that there was a Moonquake that released all this water-wind into the atmosphere. Well, I don’t see any information regarding seismic activity during this time. You would think that would be important to substantiate their theory by saying, hey, we had a tremor right about that same time, and just like the water-wind, it spread out for like 100 square miles, too. (Repeat: 100 SQUARE MILES. This becomes very relevant in a couple of paragraphs.) Apparently, that quake didn’t happen. Speculation: exhaust, escape valve, water main break deep in the Moon that spilled out. In other words, this was an artificial event!
That wasn’t enough bullshit, though. They couldn’t let the lie fade away, but had to make up something even more ridiculous to insult common sense and intelligence. Here’s the ten pounds of bullshit in a five pound bag again:
NAS-hole to public: Well, you see, here’s what really happened. We had these two water tanks, right, from Apollo 12 and 14. They each had between 60 and 100 pounds of water in them. What happened was that both tanks ruptured at the same time, and that explains everything.
Problem: The water tanks were 180 kilometers apart. The atmospheric instruments were facing in opposite directions, and recorded the water-wind at an equal strength at both ends. So, we are supposed to believe that a maximum of 200 pounds of water created a cloud of vapor that lasted 14 hours, and spread out evenly over a distance of 100 square miles. When is the last time you had a gallon of water in your house spontaneously burst? Not very often, huh? How about two gallons of water bursting at the same time? That ever happen to you? What about two gallons of water bursting at the same time, and spreading out like water-wind all over your neighborhood for 14 hours? Sounds legit, right?
Let’s talk about the lunar marias. These were once molten rock and they are now solid rock. However, rock specimens that have been collected do not contain any evidence of volcanic eruptions on the Moon. I guess I could speculate here, even though I have no real way to connect this to anything. When have you ever seen molten material in a place without a volcano? Well, you might see metal in liquid form in a blacksmith shop. Later the metal is molded, cooled down, and shaped into something. Could the same process have been used on a scale large enough to produce a spaceship as large as the Moon?
Speculation: In the previous article from The Ringmakers Of Saturn, author Bergrun speculated that there are a ton of spaceships around Saturn and other celestial bodies. The size of some of these spaceships has been theorized as being 400 to 600 kilometers long. That’s about 250 to 370 miles! The theory is that the ships use electromagnetic plasma to cause massive changes on a planet or moon’s surface. Plasma can get pretty hot, as stars like our Sol are made out of that stuff, allegedly.
Ever heard of arc welding? That’s where hot electricity produces plasma that welds pieces of metal together. Is it possible to heat rocks to the point where they turn molten, as a way to create a sort of plaster that becomes the outer wall of a gigantic spaceship? Let’s pretend that the Moon is like the Death Star from the Star Wars movies. It would be impractical to use that much metal or metal alloy on such a big spaceship. You could deplete entire planets of metal that way! What if, on the other hand, you can crush all these asteroids together, and then heat them until they become soft and pliant, and then shape them while they’re cooling like you would at a forge. What a coincidence! Luna, the Phobos moon on Mars and Comet P67, which I believe are all artificial, have a rocky but anomalous texture on them! Maybe that’s the practical way of building a giant spaceship; by creating an outer wall around it made of molten rock.
Another coincidence: 80% of the Moon’s marias are facing the Earth. However, most of the craters and mountains on the Moon are on the dark side that we never get to see. Remember how in previous articles, the idea of frequencies being aimed at the Earth was brought up? Remember how the marias have a lot of electromagnetic anomalies around them? What if these areas of molten rock serve as the tuning forks for those frequencies? It would make sense, wouldn’t it, to always aim your transmitters in the direction you’re going to broadcast. That means that 50% of the Earth might have frequencies beamed at it all the time. The marias are the radar dishes, and the disk-shaped mascons, which are located dead center inside the marias like giant bullseyes, are the actual transmitters.
We have another mention of Russian astronomer Kozyrev, and the gaseous burst he observed in Alphonsus Crater. He said these were fluorescent gases. Okay. Then, he saw a reddish glow that he said were carbon compounds. The problem here is he also saw that reddish glow moving around until it later disappeared. That was 1958. In 1963, astronomers saw reddish glows around the crests of ridges of Aristarchus Region.
The author of the article thinks that, first off, the Moon is artificial, and whenever the Moon gets too close to the Earth, it ‘creaks’ thanks to the Earth’s gravity. Just like when you open a creaky door, which would not have creaked unless you got near enough to pester it.
The next part goes on to say that data suggests the Moon is hollow. Astronaut Edgar Mitchell’s comment was that the Moon couldn’t be hollow, but instead had giant caverns in it that made it seem that way. Yeah, wank this, buddy. That one bland statement really covers every single anomaly that all these other people are observing and writing about. A Dr. Farouk El Baz stated that experiments were conducted on the Moon to see if giant caverns were actually found. What were the results of these experiments? Well, they were never released to the public. Why do you think that is? Yeah, okay, Dr. Baz, when Mitchell is finished wanking me off, you can take over for him.
We’ve got some other stuff that was covered before. There are dense materials found on the Moon’s surface, like titanium that Earth people use to make planes and spaceships. We’ve got people who watched the astronauts drilling on the Moon, and come up with what looked like processed metals. We’ve got brass, mica and amphibole, and other substances that shouldn’t be on the Moon. We’ve got rusty iron particles, and iron particles that don’t rust at all. We’ve got the theory that the Moon came out of the Pacific Ocean, which I think is false, and the theory that the Moon was created from the leftovers of when the Earth was formed, which is also false, because the Earth would have long ago sucked it in through its gravity and absorbed it.
Then we’ve got some theories that are just plain dumb. 1. A planet crashed into the Earth and its debris formed the Moon. 2. Even more hilarious, and which I covered before, the Moon was on its way to a cosmic party, and the Earth reached out to nab it and kept it. Right. Even noted sci-fi author Isaac Asimov discounted the capture theory as being impossible.
The Moon should wobble but it doesn’t. Think of it like a ball with its mass off-center. It wouldn’t roll in a straight line, but there is the Moon, with its perfect circle around the Earth and always showing that one side to us. No other satellite in our solar system does this. Also, the Moon has a bulge, but that is on the dark side, so Earth’s gravity field could not have pulled on it to produce it. Get the picture?
In July of 1970, two Russian scientists, Vasin and Schcherbakov, published an article about the Moon being artificial. I’ve read about this article a few times now, but in this case some of the details of their findings are given. These scientists proposed that the Moon was made somewhere far, far way, by beings that have technology far superior to what is currently available on Earth. Giant machines were used to melt rock into cavities, and the refuse was put on the surface. Thus, the inside hull would be protected by the outer shell of junk rock. Again, this sounds a lot more practical than a great Death Star made entirely of metals.
This theory, according to the scientists, would explain every single anomaly about the Moon. This would include the densest rock being found on the surface, the elements, the maria, the mascons, the orbit, the water, the Moonquakes when the Earth is closer, and the gas clouds made by equipment below the surface.
The problem is that if we admit that the Moon is artificial, we’ll have to reevaluate a lot of our present beliefs. Our world governments or our general population are not ready to deal with such a change, and so they all sweep it under the rug and discredit those of us who care enough to delve into the subject looking for Truth.
(Source: Food For The Moon) This articles begins with a reference to what is known as Fourth Way Philosophy. The goal of this philosophy is to take away the hypnotized and mechanical parts of humans, and to build within them an enlightened core. The founder of the movement is Georges Gurdjieff, and along with admonishing the mechanical acts of men, would also frequently say that men are ‘food for the Moon.’ While some would interpret that term as being figurative or symbolic, the author of this article firmly believes that Gurdjieff was being literal.
Peter Ouspensky was a disciple of the Fourth Way. He describes the Moon as being an embryo that uses electromagnetic energy to pull on all living things on Earth. When a human or other creature dies, their life essence is drawn away from Earth and absorbed by the Moon. (Santos Bonacci has stated something similar: The Moon takes away the dead souls, while Saturn introduces new souls to Earth.)
The Moon keeps most of us going, like the pendulum of a clock affecting all its gears. This would be true for the vast majority of humanity. Just look at the West. If everyone is told that it is necessary to go to college, to get married and have a career, and to raise children in the same exact way, then that is exactly what most people are going to do. There is no true creativity or individuality within them, for even the rebels in the crowd will want to conform to other rebels. I have long remarked that most people seem to lack much depth or dimension and are almost two-dimensional. They remind me more of cardboard images of people or supporting cast members in a movie. Without the Moon to ‘motivate’ us, Ouspensky believes people will be as passive as puppets without a puppeteer. Another initiate into this Fourth Way, one Rodney Collins, thinks that since humans are made mostly of water, and since the Moon pulls on water, perhaps the Moon affects us in more profound ways and can even account for the way our physical limbs move.
Ouspensky claims there is no connection between the full Moon and lunacy, because the Moon is using the same amount of pull regardless of what phase it is in. The author’s article admits that while this fact is true, the alignment between the Sun, the Moon and Earth ‘colors’ or influences what energies humans receive. The correlation between full Moons and erratic behavior in people is well documented. I will add further that this is why the Moon maintains a constant orbit around Earth, to ensure its influence will affect, possibly, every living thing on Earth. Think of the Moon as a revolving sprinkler system that makes sure every corner of a lawn is watered.
According to Grudjieff, the Moon is an embryo and dependent on its Mother Earth. The Moon cannot hold its own atmosphere or on its own produce life. It can be seen as a fetus with an electromagnetic umbilical cord attaching it to Earth, or it can even be seen as a parasite.
Upon death, the organic body returns to Earth, while the astral energies leave this world and make their way up to the Moon. Further, emotional or psychological suffering produces energies that ‘feed’ the Moon, and this is a bad thing for our personal evolution. Ouspensky’s solution to dislodge our selves from the Moon’s programming is to ‘create a Moon within ourselves.’ The author interprets this as becoming more self-aware, of making conscious choices not to conform to society’s expectations, but to help with our own personal evolution.
To keep this analysis at a reasonable reading length, I’ll cut it off here. Before The Moon Existed 9 will pick up where I left off, and will be posted soon.