Mandela Effect, False Flag 9/11: Buildings 5 And 6 Now Affected

In my original reality, the Twin Towers fell and WTC Building 7 was the smoking gun, because it was two football fields away and fell due to minor fires, without being hit by any plane. Aussie chicks from One People Round Table covered how Building 6 is a new anomaly, with the structure being cored out and the outer walls left standing. I did not have a post dedicated to this anomaly when Aussie chicks first talked about it, and so I just looked up a corroborating video here from Life Matrix’s channel.

But I’m not done yet. In my next post, you’ll see that WTC Building 4 was somehow vaporized, too.


Title: 911 WTC Bldg 5 & 6 Reality Vote – Mandela Effect ‘d (YT link) Uploaded by Life Matrix.

By raymondtowers Tagged

2 comments on “Mandela Effect, False Flag 9/11: Buildings 5 And 6 Now Affected

  1. Sorry but I call BS as there never was a building 5 and 6 deal. I know other buildings had minor damage around it but not any building 5 or 6 specificly

    • Other buildings only had minor damage? No damage to 5 or 6? That’s why this is an ME, because in this reality, the entire WTC complex of 7 buildings either fell on that day or were so badly damaged they were later demolished. That’s buildings WTC 1 through 7. In my reality, WTC 1 and 2 had asbestos issues, making it feasible for them to have an ‘accident,’ and WTC 7 was the smoking gun that fell without being hit by a plane. None of the news stories or later research covered any of the other buildings, including live eyewitness accounts.

      From the 9/11 research site:

      Building 5


      WTC 5 was severely damaged by fallout from the destruction of the Towers. Large falling pieces of steel from the Towers’ perimeter walls are the probable cause of the holes in the roof seen from above. The pattern of damage of the building’s structure does not support the idea that it was caused by explosives in the building.


      Serious fires raged through WTC 5 for hours. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires far more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 5 did not collapse. FEMA’s report has a number of photographs of Building 5 wreckage, and concludes that fires caused the collapse of portions of this building, without making a convincing case.

      Building 6


      WTC 6 was severely damaged on September 11 with two holes that extend the height of the building. The photo, from directly overhead WTC 6 on September 23, shows a large crater in the center of the building, and a smaller one in the southeast end (bottom of photo). The holes had remarkably clean profiles, with the same region punched out of each floor. The shapes of the holes may provide clues about the destruction of the North Tower.


      It appears that fires may have raged through WTC 6. The FEMA Report, which has extensive discussion about fires in WTC 5, is silent on fires in WTC 6. From the appearance of the remains of WTC 6, it probably had fires similar in severity to those in WTC 5. Despite the massive structural damage shown by the holes, and fires probably more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 6 did not collapse.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s